Today in my astrobiology class, I was talking about Saturn's rings and ringlets and I showed this photo:
This is an image of Saturn's F ring as imaged by the Voyager 1 space probe in 1980. We were discussing the ring structure and I was showing that some parts of the rings were not perfectly circular. This is due to the gravitational effects of the small moons near the rings on the ring particles.
But in talking about the ringlet in this photo, I was also telling the class about the camera technology on the early space probes. I said that the Voyager camera was actually a film camera. Space probes with film cameras have the capability to process the film on board and then used a scanner to digitize the image for transmission to Earth. It's a great strategy that was used before digital cameras were regularly put on space probes.
Except, the Voyager missions didn't use film cameras. Oops. Guess I'll issue a retraction next class.
But on my train ride home I was reading my current book: That's the Way the Cookie Crumbles: 62 All-New Commentaries on the Fascinating Chemistry of Everyday Life by Joe Schwarcz when I realized I had made a mistake in my OTHER class that I'm teaching.
Yesterday in "Light and Atoms" we were talking about what holds water inside a capped bottle having a hole on the side of it. (Answer: the air pressure of the room holds it in until the cap is loosened.) But the topic of surface tension was raised by one student. So I turned on the water faucet and splashed the water around in the sink with my hand. I asked if the water molecules were being held together by chemical bonds and if so, was I producing a chemical reaction to break the bonds as I splashed the water around. (My answer was no, which it still is, but it was still part of the mistake.) I then went on to explain what surface tension means and how you can lower it with a tiny bit of soap.
Except that surface tension depends on the weak hydrogen bond between water molecules. I didn't talk about that. So, I may have left the class thinking that there is no chemical bonding between water molecules. Clearly that's not true. The mistake I made was mixing analogies.
I'm quickly trying to learn more about hydrogen bonding so I can figure out how to correct any confusions I may have introduced.